Ex Parte Capstone Development Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is treated as a dismissal without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to reinstitute the action
• holding that a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is treated as a dismissal without prejudice
• declining to apply res judicata based on interpretation of failure to make a demand as a procedural defect
• a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is treated as a dismissal without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to reinstitute the action
• expressly rejecting Bazata and declining to apply res judicata in the same situation
• giving preclusive effect to a Rule 23.1 dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).