Ex Parte Cameron Michael Moon v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an increase in monetary liability could not be applied retroactively even though the “normative scope of Title VII’s prohibition on workplace discrimination” was not altered
• holding that no change to the Supreme Court's interpretation of a federal statute has the force of law unless it is implemented through legislation.
• holding that an increase in monetary liability is retroactive even though the normative scope of law was not altered
• holding that \judicial construction of a statute is an authoritative statement of what the statute meant before as well as after the decision of the case giving rise to that construction\
• holding that “clear evidence of intent to impose the restorative statute ‘retroactively ” is required to overcome the presumption against retroactive amendments
• holding that “clear evidence of intent to impose the restorative statute ‘retroactively ” is required to overcome the presumption against retroactive amendments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).