Skip to main content
· 3/22/1939

Ex Parte C. C. Kincaid

Citations

  • 126 S.W.2d 3
  • 132 Tex. 580
  • 1939 Tex. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because issue in child protection case concerns conditions surrounding child, and not culpability of any particular parent, trial court could rely on evidence that is admissible against either parent
  • holding, that “because the trial court ceased reunification efforts in an order entered following an initial disposition hearing, N.C.G.S. § 7B-901(c) was necessarily implicated.”
  • holding, that “because the trial court ceased reunification efforts in an order entered following an initial disposition hearing, N.C.G.S. § 7B-901(c) was necessarily implicated.”
  • holding, that “because the trial court ceased reunification efforts in an order entered following an initial disposition hearing, N.C.G.S. § 7B-901(c) was necessarily implicated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Critz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.