Ex-parte Bryant
Citations
- 24 Fla. 278
Syllabus
<p>1. In a case of larceny where the convict is sentenced to pay a fine, with directions for commitment to custody until it is paid, the fine is the penalty, and the commitment only a process for enforcing the payment thereof.</p> <p>2. A sentence to pay a fine, and that the “ sheriff do keep you in cus tody until the judgment of the court is complied with,” is not itself a. violation of section 8 of the Bill of Rights of this State in regard to “indefinite imprisonment.” The sentence with award of process does not necessarily create any imprisonment; and neither the award nor a holding under it can he said to create indefinite imprisonment in the absence of circumstances shown making it so.</p>
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex parte PellsSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 25×
- Anderson v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-07-02· cited 22×
- Seifert v. Arnold Bros.California Court of Appeal· 1934-04-26· cited 14×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 8×
- State v. SorensonMontana Supreme Court· 1922-11-13· cited 4×
- Shoop v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1946-01-28· cited 3×
- Sheriff of Dauphin County v. Dauphin CountyDauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1923-04-16
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.