Supreme Court· 5/10/1926
Ex parte Brown
Citations
- 271 U.S. 645
- 46 S. Ct. 489
- 70 L. Ed. 1130
- 1926 U.S. LEXIS 659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Mere continuous administration of property under order of court does not constitute an ‘act’ or ‘transaction’ on part of the receiver”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Henry Harold Parker, United States of America v. David Joe GreenTenth Circuit· 1973-01-03· cited 38×
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.S.D. New York· 1935-01-10· cited 22×
- Walker v. Maury County (In Re Scott Housing Systems, Inc.)S.D. Georgia· 1988-07-22· cited 9×
- United States v. ThomasW.D. Kentucky· 1943-04-07· cited 8×
- Gasser v. Infanti International, Inc.E.D. New York· 2005-03-30
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.