Ex Parte Brent Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding standing for fair housing group whose mission to advocate against housing discrimination was frustrated by resource diversion toward fighting alleged Fair Housing Act violations
• finding standing where the organization alleged that its mission had been frustrated “because it has had to divert resources in order to investigate and prosecute the alleged discriminatory practices”
• finding standing where the organization alleged that its mission had been frustrated “because it has had to divert resources in order to investigate and prosecute the alleged discriminatory practices”
• finding standing where the organization alleged that its mission had been frustrated “because it has had to divert resources in order to investigate and prosecute the alleged discriminatory practices”
• “The Supreme Court specifically held that a fair housing group, like the FHRC, has standing to sue [under the Fair Housing Act] if the discriminatory practices it is challenging have impaired its ability to carry out its mission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).