Ex parte Beard
Citations
- 41 Tex. 234
Syllabus
<p>1. Judgment.—When the defendant in a criminal cause has been found guilty by the verdict of a jury, and appeals before an entry of final judgment against him, the District Court may enter final judgment nune pro lune after a term has intervened since the verdict.</p> <p>2. Jurisdiction.—Article 3151, Pas. Dig., does not restrict the general powers of the District Court to render the judgment at a later period than the first term after verdict, when it clearly appears that the prosecution has not been abandoned, and a proper case for the exercise of the power is presented.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- judgment was not rendered against the defendant during the term of court in which the trial occurred but was rendered later nunc pro tunc
- judgment was not rendered against the defendant during the term of court in which the trial occurred but was rendered later nunc pro tunc
- judgment was not rendered against the defendant during the term of court in which the trial occurred but was rendered later nunc pro tunc
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Blanton, Donald GeneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-27· cited 235×
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-01-11· cited 7×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-05-04· cited 4×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-10-12· cited 4×
- Benedict v. StateOhio Supreme Court· 1887-01-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.