· 11/25/1992
Ex Parte Barley
Citations
- 842 S.W.2d 694
- 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212
- 1992 WL 341960
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stacking sentences after the defendant has started serving one sentence violates the constitutional protection from double jeopardy because it punishes the defendant twice for the same offense
- stacking sentences after the defendant has started serving one sentence violates the constitutional protection from double jeopardy because it punishes the defendant twice for the same offense
- a cumulation order entered after a defendant has commenced serving his sentence violates double jeopardy provisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.