Skip to main content

Ex Parte Anderson

Citations

  • 900 S.W.2d 333
  • 1995 WL 358886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court could not enter a new contempt judgment that corrected the earlier judgment’s failure to state how the contemnor could purge himself because the new judgment was not signed close enough in time to the original pronouncement of contempt
  • holding that a trial court could not enter a new contempt judgment that corrected the earlier judgment = s failure to state how the contemnor could purge himself because the new judgment was not signed close enough in time to the original pronouncement of contempt
  • holding corrected contempt and commitment order signed more than four months after contempt hearing and almost two months after appellate court had granted habeas corpus not sufficiently close in time to contempt finding to satisfy due process requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.