Ewton, Steven Charles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party must file a cross-appeal if it seeks to alter the judgment below on an issue not resolved in its favor
• holding that the primary jurisdiction had been waived “by the agreement to submit to arbitration issues that the doctrine would otherwise assign to an administrative agency”
• affirming that the standards set forth in Evansville-Vanderburgh are still good law, although that decision otherwise has been statutorily overruled
• deciding the questions presented on other grounds and not reaching the issue of the implied right of action
• noting that a “reasoned decision” of the Secretary of Transportation would be entitled to Chevron-type deference in a dispute over the meaning of a provision of the Anti-Head Tax Act, 49 USC 1513
• suggesting that “[t]he reasonableness of the Airport’s rates might have been referred, prior to any court’s consideration, to the Department of Transportation under the primary jurisdiction doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).