District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/7/2008
Ewing v. State
Citations
- 996 So. 2d 871
- 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15338
- 2008 WL 4471094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When Appellant raised specific complaints regarding his counsel’s performance, the court was obligated to inquire of counsel regarding the complaints.”
- “Because the trial court did not conduct a Nelson hearing after Appellant made specific complaints regarding counsel’s performance, we reverse and remand for a new trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Thomas, Wolf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-28· cited 400×
- Heuss v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 44×
- Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-17· cited 37×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-30· cited 27×
- Maxwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 20×
- Graves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-14· cited 14×
- Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-21· cited 9×
- Davenport v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.