Skip to main content
· 2/26/1971

Ewing v. Sargent

Citations

  • 482 P.2d 819
  • 87 Nev. 74
  • 1971 Nev. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that recovery in quantum meruit was not warranted where the claimant did not show that the value provided exceeded that received
  • “Numerous authorities 2 there exists between the parties an express contract covering the same subject matter.”
  • “Numerous authorities 18 tend to support respondent’s view that an action does not lie on an implied contract where there 19 exists between the parties an express contract covering the same subject matter.”
  • “Numerous authorities 18 tend to support respondent’s view that an action does not lie on an implied contract where there 19 exists between the parties an express contract covering the same subject matter.”
  • discussing recovery in quantum meruit to prevent unjust enrichment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batjer, Gunderson, Mowbray, Thompson, Zenoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.