· 1/28/1892
Ewing v. Lemcke
Citations
- 130 Ind. 600
- 29 N.E. 1061
- 1892 Ind. LEXIS 398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where recent decisions “unintentionally departed” from earlier established law, stare decisis does not require the court to follow the later holdings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.