Skip to main content
· 1/28/1892

Ewing v. Lemcke

Citations

  • 130 Ind. 600
  • 29 N.E. 1061
  • 1892 Ind. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where recent decisions “unintentionally departed” from earlier established law, stare decisis does not require the court to follow the later holdings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.