Skip to main content
· 10/16/1979

Ewing v. Alexander

Citations

  • 285 N.W.2d 808
  • 93 Mich. App. 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that a malpractice plaintiffs expert witness need not expressly testify that the defendant violated the applicable standard of care, so long as the witness provides enough information to justify that inference by a fact-finder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Brennan, Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.