Ewing Construction Co. v. Amerisure Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an NIT warrant exceeded the magistrate judge’s Rule 41 jurisdiction
• finding a similar warrant that exceeded the territorial limits of Rule 41 invalid
• finding a similar warrant that exceeded the territorial limits of Rule 41 invalid
• “The court finds that the Government’s warrant request is not supported by the application presented. This is not to say that such a potent investigative technique could never be authorized under Rule 41.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).