Ewer v. Myrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “At the ttme Nevada amended its rules in 2004, federal courts were already interpreting its rule as allowing service of process by a plaintiff's attorney.” (citing Tis. of Local Union No. 727 Pension Fund v. Perfect Parking, Inc., 126 F.R.D. 48, 52 (N.D. Ill. 1989
• “At the time Nevada amended its rules in 2004, federal courts were already interpreting its rule as allowing service of process by a plaintiff’s attorney.” (citing Trs. of Local Union No. 727 Pension Fund v. Perfect Parking, Inc., 126 F.R.D. 48, 52 (N.D. Ill. 1989
• “At the time Nevada amended its rules in 2004, federal courts were already interpreting its rule as allowing service of process by a plaintiff’s attorney.” (citing Trs. of Local Union No. 727 Pension Fund v. Perfect Parking, Inc., 126 F.R.D. 48, 52 (N.D. Ill. 1989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).