· 3/13/1986
Ewe Distributors, Inc. v. Chu
Citations
- 629 F. Supp. 1527
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he existence of a pending state court action is not a prerequisite to Pullman-type abstention.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.