Skip to main content
· 3/13/1986

Ewe Distributors, Inc. v. Chu

Citations

  • 629 F. Supp. 1527
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he existence of a pending state court action is not a prerequisite to Pullman-type abstention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.