Skip to main content

E.W. v. State

Citations

  • 873 So. 2d 485
  • 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant remained unlawfully on school property because, as a minor, appellant could not leave school without parental consent
  • holding that evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant remained unlawfully on school property because, as a minor, appellant could not leave school without parental consent
  • “The ‘legitimate business’ which would entitle one to enter or remain upon school property refers to any purpose for being there which is connected with the operation of the school.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, Ervin, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named E.W. v. State

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.