Skip to main content

E.W. v. D.C.H.

Citations

  • 231 Mont. 481
  • 754 P.2d 816
  • 45 State Rptr. 778
  • 9 A.L.R. 5th 1046
  • 1988 Mont. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the total extent of damages need not be known
  • explaining that the total extent of damages need not be known
  • victim of sexual abuse need not know of causal link between abuse and psychological problems; she had duty to inquire into cause
  • superseded by statute as noted in Cosgriffe v. Cosgriffe, 262 Mont. 175, 864 P.2d 776, 780 (1993); Lovelace v. Keohane, 831 P.2d 624, 632 (Okla.1992); Doe v. R.D., 308 S.C. 139, 417 S.E.2d 541, 542 (1992
  • superseded by statute as noted in Cosgriffe v. Cosgriffe, 262 Mont. 175, 864 P.2d 776, 780 (1993); Lovelace v. Keohane, 831 P.2d 624, 632 (Okla.1992); Doe v. R.D., 308 S.C. 139, 417 S.E.2d 541, 542 (1992
  • overruled by Mont.Code Ann. § 27-2-216 (1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gulbrandson, Harrison, Hunt, McDonough, Sheehy, Turnage, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.