E.W. Hinderliter v. Bureau of Driver Licensing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “liberal” standard for motions to amend set forth in Rule 15(a)(2
• holding that district court erred in applying the good cause standard to a motion to amend when the scheduling order set a deadline only for amendment of pleadings without leave of the court
• holding when scheduling order sets deadline after which all amendments are prohibited, Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4)’s “good cause” requirement for amendment applies
• explaining that “[t]he period of liberal amendment [under Rule 15(a)(2)] ends if the district court issues a scheduling order setting a date after which no amendment will be permitted”
• explaining that “[t]he period of liberal amendment [under Rule 15(a)(2)] ends if the district court issues a scheduling order setting a date after which no amendment will be permitted”
• noting that “a claim under ERISA may withstand a motion to dismiss based on sufficient circumstantial factual allegations to support the claim, even if it lacks direct allegations of misconduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).