Evink v. Pekin Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “plaintiffs would have no standing to challenge [the] defense counsel’s ability to represent [two defendants] without some showing that this representation adversely affects their interests”
• stating that the “plaintiffs would 6 have no standing to challenge [the] defense counsel’s ability to represent [two 7 defendants] without some showing that this representation adversely affects their 8 interests”
• moving party has no standing to challenge opposing counsel’s representation of multiple parties without some showing that this representation adversely affected the moving party’s interests
• moving party has no standing to challenge opposing counsel's representation of multiple parties without some showing that this representation adversely affected the moving party's interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).