· 4/28/2010
Everspeed Enterprises Ltd. v. Skaarup Shipping Int'l
Citations
- 754 F. Supp. 2d 395
- 2010 A.M.C. 2139
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133051
- 2010 WL 5071692
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “Rule B(l)(a) is inapplicable” where each of the defendants,resides or has a principal place of business in the district in which the action is brought
- holding that “Rule B(1)(a) is inapplicable” where each of the defendants resides or has a principal place of business in the district in which the action is brought
- “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
- “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
- “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
- “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stefan R. Underhill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.