Skip to main content
· 4/28/2010

Everspeed Enterprises Ltd. v. Skaarup Shipping Int'l

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 2d 395
  • 2010 A.M.C. 2139
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133051
  • 2010 WL 5071692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Rule B(l)(a) is inapplicable” where each of the defendants,resides or has a principal place of business in the district in which the action is brought
  • holding that “Rule B(1)(a) is inapplicable” where each of the defendants resides or has a principal place of business in the district in which the action is brought
  • “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
  • “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
  • “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”
  • “Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a plaintiff to utilize the state prejudgment remedies available to secure a judgment that might ultimately be rendered in an action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stefan R. Underhill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.