Skip to main content
· 3/7/2008

Everson v. Honacher

Citations

  • 268 F. App'x 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Staff Sergeant Coleman’s communications with his father-in-law, (a reverend) about Coleman’s sexual abuse of his daughter and its impact on his marriage were not privileged
  • disclosures to father-in-law who was a minister not privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.