Everlast Sporting Goods Mfg. Co. v. Aetna Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that New York Human Rights Law does not prohibit gender-based insurance rates in light of insurance law’s prohibition against discrimination based on factors not including sex and in light of provision for gender-based age setbacks
• concluding that New York Human Rights Law does not prohibit gender-based insurance rates in light of insurance law's prohibition against discrimination based on factors not including sex and in light of provision for gender-based age setbacks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).