Everhart v. Miles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when appellees moved, leaving behind repairs to and improvements on appellants’ land, the latter were unjustly enriched as they benefitted from appellees’, labor
• finding that the plaintiffs repairs and improvements to the defendant’s property constituted a benefit for purposes of unjust enrichment
• finding that plaintiffs’ work of making repairs and improvements to the defendant’s property constituted a benefit for purposes of unjust enrichment
• affirming unjust enrichment judgment for plaintiff despite argument that the “benefits in question were thrust upon” the defendant in part because the plaintiff’s actions were “not strictly voluntary on their part”
• making repairs and improvements on defendant’s property constituted a benefit
• making repairs and improvements on defendant’s property constituted a benefit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).