Evergreen Credit Union v. Woodman (In Re Woodman)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to review a party’s argument in light of its “failure to advance [it] before the bankruptcy court in the first instance”
• “Allowing the Commissioner to decide the issue again would create an 3 unfair ‘heads we win; tails, let’s play again’ system of disability benefits adjudication.”
• “the proper course, except in rare circumstances, is to 2 remand to the agency for additional investigation or explanation”
• under Ward, potential effect of 18 favoritism not dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).