Everett v. Hardy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in a class action, “individualized inquiries can be handled through ‘streamlined mechanisms’ such as affidavits and proper auditing procedures” and that “Defendants’ due process rights are not harmed by such case-management tools”
• noting that \not every issue must be amenable to common resolution\ to satisfy predominance, and that \individual inquiries may be required after the class phase\
• stating that individualized inquiries in a consumer-fraud class of software purchasers “could be handled through streamlined mechanisms such as affidavits and proper auditing procedures”
• noting that claims \may feature some factual variations as long as they have the same essential characteristics\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing that affidavits and auditing procedures can be used to handle individualized inquiries
• observing that affidavits and auditing procedures can be used to handle individualized inquiries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).