Skip to main content
· 10/3/2016

Everett v. Conley

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 123
  • 196 L. Ed. 2d 98
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3142
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While the veracity of and factual basis for Ms. DeSoto’s statements to Kelly Services on July 9, 2001, might be relevant in a lawsuit against Walter Reed, they have no bearing on Ms. Coles’s retaliation claim against Kelly Services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.