Skip to main content
· 4/22/1966

Everett v. Bosch

Citations

  • 241 Cal. App. 2d 648
  • 50 Cal. Rptr. 813
  • 1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that whether there has been delay amounting to laches is a fact question
  • deed ambiguous because description of property by metes and bounds conflicted with description of property by lot number

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lillie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.