Skip to main content
· 7/16/1931

Everett Pulp & Paper Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 23 B.T.A. 1179
  • 1931 BTA LEXIS 1757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court could have used “an appropriate curative instruction, even after [the witness’s] testimony,” after the defense failed to make a timely objection that the witness was in shackles
  • listing steps that court should take before permitting an inmate witness — for either side — to testify in shackles
  • defense counsel must object to witness’ appearance in shackles or request a curative instruction to the jury; a trial judge is not required to conduct a security hearing sua sponte
  • mistrial ruling will be overturned only ifthere is a substantial likelihood the error prompting the mistrial request affected the verdict
  • mistrial ruling will be overturned only if there is a substantial likelihood the error prompting the mistrial request affected the verdict
  • State v. Kwan Fai Mak, 105 Wn.2d 692, 701, 718 P.2d 407, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995 (1986)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Artjndell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.