Skip to main content
· 3/12/1897

Everett Land Co. v. Maney

Citations

  • 16 Wash. 552
  • 48 P. 243
  • 1897 Wash. LEXIS 360

Syllabus

<p>STIPULATED DAMAGES — WHETHER PENALTY OR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES — ADMISSIBILITY OF PAROL — EVIDENCE OF CONTEMPORANEOUS AGREEMENTS.</p> <p>Where, in addition to the money consideration for a conveyance of real estate, a note for a further sum is also given, which it is stipulated shall be void if the grantee shall erect on the land within a given time a certain class of buildings, the grantor is entitled to receive as liquidated damages, for a failure to erect such buildings, the sum named in the note.</p> <p>Where the damages resulting from the breach of a contract are indefinite, uncertain and difficult to prove, the amount stipulated in the contract as damages in case of a breach should be considered as liquidated damages and not as a penalty.</p> <p>Parol proof of contemporaneous agreements between the parties is inadmissible to affect their written contract, in the absence of allegations in the complaint of deceit and false representations.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.