Everett Heyman D/B/A Pleasure Products Co. v. Ar. Winarick, Inc., Ar. Winarick, Inc., Dura-Gloss Division, Jules Winarick and Hugo L. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a casual, single-word description of a trade secret was too “vague and indefinite” to be a legally protectable disclosure of a trade secret
• rejecting trade secret 31 Next Cominc’ns, Inc. v. Viber Media, Inc., 758 F. App’x 46, 49 n.3 (2d Cir. 2018
• misappropriation of trade secrets supports a claim of unfair competition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).