Everett Erxleben v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• per -5- The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views set forth in this opinion. curiam
• “The Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. s 2671 et seq., is a congressional waiver of sovereign immunity.” (citing United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 (1979))
• “[I]f the appellant’s claim form as submitted was not sufficient as a presentation of his claim under section 2675(a), . . . the district court’s dismissal is proper.”
• where Form SF 95 identified the amount of personal injury 22 damages as “$149.42 presently,” concluding that the “inclusion of the term ‘presently’ did 23 not in any way preclude” the government for settling for the specific dollar amounts listed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).