Everett E. Hodges, III v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]ven though Mr. Hodges alleges breach of an employment agreement and not the collective bargaining agreement itself he is still obliged to seek relief primarily and exclusively through arbitration”
• disallowing the plaintiffs claim under a third-party beneficiary theory because the plaintiff refused to participate in arbitration as provided by statute and, stating in dicta, that the claim was “but another aspect of the implied right of action argument”
• failure to serve a response in opposition to a motion constitutes consent to grant that motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).