Skip to main content
· 4/13/1994

Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance Company

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 226
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 4924
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2574
  • 30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1534
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7107
  • 1994 WL 123102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that patent infringement is not caused by conduct committed in the course of advertising
  • holding “[t]o compel an insurer to defend under an advertising injury provision, the insured must demonstrate a causal connection between the plaintiffs claim in the underlying action and the defendant-insured’s advertising”
  • noting that patentee’s claim never asserted that infringement occurred because of insured’s advertising
  • noting that patentee’s claim never asserted that infringement occurred because of insured’s advertising

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Wiggins, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.