Skip to main content
· 11/22/2006

Eveready Battery Co. v. LPI CONSUMER PRODUCTS

Citations

  • 464 F. Supp. 2d 887
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88630
  • 2006 WL 3391086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that second filer warned, “we will instruct our Associate Counsel to pursue the matter in the Federal Courts” and gave first filer seven days to respond to subsequent correspondence
  • noting second filer sued one month after first suit, but also four days before being served with first-filer’s complaint
  • “[G]ood faith settlement negotiations should be encouraged, rather than rushing to the courthouse, and application of the first-filed rule should not penalize parties for their efforts to settle matters out of court.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.