Skip to main content
· 8/6/1998

Eveready Battery Co., Inc. v. Zinc Products Co.

Citations

  • 21 F. Supp. 2d 1060
  • 1998 WL 668623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that first-filing party’s desire to determine obligations under contract is not enough to demonstrate litigation and immediate resolution is necessary such that declaratory judgment is otherwise appropriate
  • “Evidence of insufficient notice of a change in the first-filing party’s position on the dispute prior to filing of the first action is indicative of a rush to the court house and thus, compelling circumstances warranting non-application of the ‘first-filed’ rule.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sippel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.