· 4/27/2006
Evercrete Corp. v. H-Cap Ltd.
Citations
- 429 F. Supp. 2d 612
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23639
- 2006 WL 1133330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting all potential factual disputes must be resolved in plaintiffs favor on motion to dismiss
- collecting cases for proposition that garden-variety trademark infringement is not a RICO predicate
- declining to resolve a factual dispute on a motion to dismiss
- “A party may raise a defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or judicial estoppel on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) where the basis for that defense is set forth on the face of the complaint or established by public record.”
- “A party may raise a defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or judicial estoppel on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) where the basis for that defense is set forth on the face of the complaint or established by public record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.