Skip to main content
· 4/27/2006

Evercrete Corp. v. H-Cap Ltd.

Citations

  • 429 F. Supp. 2d 612
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23639
  • 2006 WL 1133330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting all potential factual disputes must be resolved in plaintiffs favor on motion to dismiss
  • collecting cases for proposition that garden-variety trademark infringement is not a RICO predicate
  • declining to resolve a factual dispute on a motion to dismiss
  • “A party may raise a defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or judicial estoppel on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) where the basis for that defense is set forth on the face of the complaint or established by public record.”
  • “A party may raise a defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or judicial estoppel on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) where the basis for that defense is set forth on the face of the complaint or established by public record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.