Evelyn Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in civil cases for damages, courts should grant the privilege of IFP status sparingly
• noting that, in civil cases for damages, courts should grant the privilege of IFP status sparingly
• explaining that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) “applies to all persons requesting leave to proceed IFP”
• noting that, in civil cases for damages, courts should grant the privilege of IFP status sparingly
• explaining that § 1915(a)(1) applies to all persons requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis
• noting that, “[d]espite the statute’s use of the phrase ‘prisoner possesses,’ the affidavit requirement applies to all persons requesting leave to proceed IFP” and citing Floyd

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).