Evelyn Indyk and Leo Indyk, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Habib Bank Limited, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]o offset on a theory of unjust enrichment . . . as between the two parties to the transaction[,] the enrichment must be unjust”
• noting “[t]he absence of an allegation that Defendants tangibly benefitted at Jaffe’s expense”
• noting “[t]he absence of an allegation that Defendants tangibly benefitted at Jaffe's expense”
• an unjust enrichment claim “requires the indispensable ingredient that between the two parties involved there must be an injustice”
• “To offset on a theory of unjust enrichment, there must first be enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).