Evelyn Gonzalez-Caballero v. Ramon Eduardo Mena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “conduct after removal can be useful in determining whether consent was present at the time of removal”
• finding that a parent’s authorization of temporary removal did not equate to consent to the child’s permanent or 23 indefinite removal under the Hague Convention
• “[C]onduet after removal can be useful in determining whether consent was present at the time of removal.”
• “Under the Hague Convention’s plain, unambiguous language, consent before the removal and retention . . . extinguishes the right of return.”
• post-removal conduct could not show revocation of consent because “ex ante consent” suffices to establish defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).