Eveler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a belated notice where the defendant failed to show good cause
• holding that, after the omnibus date, “the trial court’s discretion controlled” and “[s]uch discretion is exercisable upon a showing of good cause by a defendant who has missed the deadline”
• holding that, after the omnibus date, “the trial court’s discretion controlled” and “[s]uch discretion is exercisable upon a showing of good cause by a defendant who has missed the deadline”
• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying belated motion to assert insanity defense where defendant did not make showing of good cause as required by statute
• holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s belated motion to assert an insanity defense where the defendant did not make showing of good cause as required by statute
• holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s belated motion to assert an insanity defense where the defendant did not make showing of good cause as required by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).