Evart v. Suli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co., 6 Cal. 2d 674, 59 P.2d 144 (1936), as stating similar two-part test and Adams as adopting second prong
• summary judgment reversed: jury question whether unrecovered hard object, “agreed” to be piece of beef bone, was of sufficient “size and quantity” to be harmful to consumer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).