Skip to main content
· 5/15/1871

Evansville Nat. Bank v. Metropolitan Nat. Bank

Citations

  • 8 F. Cas. 891
  • 2 Biss. 527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring the SJA to notify “defense counsel of appellant’s complaint [of counsel’s effectiveness] so that the issue of further rep- resentation [can be] resolved”
  • requiring the SJA to notify “defense counsel of appellant’s complaint [of counsel’s effectiveness] so that the issue of further rep- resentation [can be] resolved”
  • requiring the SJA to notify “defense counsel of appellant’s complaint [of counsel’s effectiveness] so that the issue of further rep- resentation [can be] resolved”
  • requiring the SJA to notify “defense counsel of appellant’s complaint [of counsel’s effectiveness] so that the issue of further rep- resentation [can be] resolved”
  • finding neither a conflict nor prejudice where, although the SJA knew of the appellant’s dissatisfaction with his representative, the trial defense counsel carried out his duties without that knowledge
  • responsibility of defense counsel to advise müitary accused of the consequences of termination of existing attorney-client relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drummond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.