· 6/3/2003
Evans v. Teton County
Citations
- 73 P.3d 84
- 139 Idaho 71
- 2003 Ida. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the appealing party must show that the Board erred and that a substantial right had been prejudiced
- “A claim of ‘spot zoning’ is essentially an argument the change in zoning is not in accord with the comprehensive plan.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kidwell, Trout, Schroeder, Eismann, Melaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.