Evans v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent contemporaneous objection or Rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, error in non-conforming written sentence and order of probation to oral pronouncement was not preserved for direct appeal
• holding that absent contemporaneous objection or Rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, error in non-conforming written sentence and order of probation to oral pronouncement was not preserved for direct appeal
• defendant did not preserve his argument regarding the discrepancy between the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence, written sentence, and order on probation with either a contemporaneous objection or a rule 3.800 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-23· cited 7×
• Daniels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-15· cited 6×
• Burney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-05· cited 2×
• Khan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-12
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-13

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hudson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-12· cited 2×