Skip to main content

Evans v. State

Citations

  • 70 S.W.3d 483
  • 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 16
  • 2002 WL 15401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disregarding testimony of appellate strategy, this court dismissed the case because the transcript was not in the record and was necessary for review of the denial of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel claim
  • test for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is “essentially the same as that employed for trial counsel”
  • test for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is “essentially the same as that employed for trial counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spinden, Smith, Newton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.