· 11/15/1879
Evans v. Rudy
Citations
- 34 Ark. 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “this court does not have jurisdiction over [plaintiffs] claims because the court may review neither criminal matters, nor the decisions of district courts.”
- holding that plaintiff’s claims related to his criminal conviction and prosecution should be transferred to district court
- holding that “this court does not have jurisdiction over [plaintiffs] claims because the court may review neither criminal matters, nor the decisions of district courts.”
- holding that the court lacks jurisdiction “to the extent that plaintiff is challenging his criminal trial, conviction, and imprisonment”
- holding that the Court of Federal Claims cannot review criminal matters
- holding that this Court has no jurisdiction to review criminal matters
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Iiasrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.