Skip to main content
· 11/15/1879

Evans v. Rudy

Citations

  • 34 Ark. 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “this court does not have jurisdiction over [plaintiffs] claims because the court may review neither criminal matters, nor the decisions of district courts.”
  • holding that plaintiff’s claims related to his criminal conviction and prosecution should be transferred to district court
  • holding that “this court does not have jurisdiction over [plaintiffs] claims because the court may review neither criminal matters, nor the decisions of district courts.”
  • holding that the court lacks jurisdiction “to the extent that plaintiff is challenging his criminal trial, conviction, and imprisonment”
  • holding that the Court of Federal Claims cannot review criminal matters
  • holding that this Court has no jurisdiction to review criminal matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Iiasrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.