Skip to main content
· 5/14/1906

Evans v. Philadelphia Bourse

Citations

  • 215 Pa. 652
  • 64 A. 463
  • 1906 Pa. LEXIS 865

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Architect—Drawings—Evidence.</p> <p>Jn an action by an architect to recover his feas, where there is evidence from which it may be inferred that the parties treated the drawings furnished by the plaintiff as those stipulated for by the contract, the case is for the jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff will be sustained.</p> <p>Trial — Charge—Preponderance of evidence — Preponderance in the number of witnesses.</p> <p>Where the court in its charge uses the expression “preponderance of evidence,” in the sense of preponderance in the number of witnesses, and this is obvious from the context, so that the jury could not have been misled, a judgment on the verdict will not be reversed.</p>

Judges: Brown, Fell, Mestbezat, Mitchell, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.