Evans v. Manos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an inmate’s view that the doctor should have prescribed something stronger than Advil does not give rise to an issue of fact as to whether his constitutional rights were violated
• explaining that an inmate’s view that the doctor should have prescribed something stronger than Advil does not give rise to an issue of fact as to whether his constitutional rights were violated
• dismissing claims against prison dentist for failure to exhaust where grievance did not name dentist or allege that plaintiff had received inadequate dental care
• sustaining claim against doctor where grievance complained of plaintiffs attempts “to see the institutional nurse or doctor” and his denial of medical treatment, but did not specifically name doctor
• dismissing inmate’s claims against dentist for failure to exhaust because “there [wa]s simply no suggestion anywhere in plaintiffs grievance that [the dentist] ... had failed to provide him with adequate dental care”
• dismissing inmate’s claims against dentist for failure to exhaust because “there [wa]s simply no suggestion anywhere in plaintiffs grievance that [the dentist] ... had failed to provide him with adequate dental care”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).